Were Smokers, Not Lepers-borderland

Relationships Free dating sites are no more judgmental than other parts of society, so no one is surprised when they ask prospective dates whether they smoke. Ewww! No one wants to date a smoker, right? Even if some of the most creative, successful, and beautiful people in the world have been smokers. It’s the same attitude even if smoking is a temporary phase in a person’s life or he’s just a weekend social puffer. So the dating service customer is forced to either lie about his smoking or grimly realize that being truthful will get him eliminated by a huge percentage of the other applicants. Since fellow smokers are apt to lie, they eliminate each other from the dating lists. Tobacco smoking hasn’t changed much in the last 3,000 years, but the attitudes sure have. The invention of the cigarette-making machine in 1818 had a huge impact it made tobacco use very popular for the next couple of centuries. Smoking is now known to be unhealthful along with air pollution, fried foods, and automobile travel but it’s still perfectly legal and fairly popular. Tobacco is a major cash crop and export product of the U.S.A., not to mention a steady source of tax dollars for every level of government. To quote William Shakespeare in his play Julius Caesar: The evil that men do lives after them; the good is oft interred with their bones. So it is with tobacco use. Yet the number of smokers in the U.S.A. remains at 24.1% of the populace, or about one in four, according to a1998 National Health Interview Survey. In 1964, 44% of adult Americans were smokers, so anti-smoking campaigns have had their desired effect. However, new studies have shown that too many anti-smoking ads produce the opposite results, especially among young people and non-conformists. This explains why anti-smoking forces have shifted their strategy in recent years from advertising campaigns to political campaigns that limit smoking in public places. But attempts at political correctness often bring out the rebellious nature in many Americans, who will accept a social stigma in order to demonstrate they won’t be pushed around. Gun owners, gamblers, and proud owners of gas-guzzling vehicles exhibit these same traits, but they seldom catch as much flack as smokers do. What bothers most smokers is the value judgment that they’re somehow morally inferior to non-smokers. History buffs know that Adolph Hitler was a fanatical opponent of tobacco, who pioneered anti-smoking laws in Nazi Germany, while Albert Einstein was a devout pipe smoker. So smoking is not necessarily a good measure of character. Should free dating sites demand to know if their customers are smokers or not? Even if it creates the unspoken policy of eliminating or ostracizing smokers from their rolls, they do. Yet they would never ask the question Are you neurotic? even though a neurotic dating partner could be more destructive than a well-mannered smoker. Maybe there is something in the careful dance of dating that inspires a few white lies and omissions, and the services assume that the smokers and neurotics will be found out. Do you think that one out of four respondents to a dating site will admit to being a smoker, as statistics suggest? Probably not, so the typical online dating site is full of hypocrisy. In November of 2008, more states and municipalities passed anti-smoking laws. Many of these laws limited places and circumstances where smoking is allowed while increasing cigarette taxes. This could be called strangling the Goose that lays the Golden Egg, but they didn’t really want to collect more taxes on the backs of smokers. The taxes were punitive, and the laws were designed to further segregate smokers from the general public, especially children. Whether this approach works to curtail an activity that is legal remains to be seen. In fact, smokers have proven enormously adaptive and considerate, seldom responding to the legal and political attacks that .e at them constantly. They pretty much just turn the other cheek, shuffling off to the distant back alley. In fact, the average American from 1964 would be astounded to see how smoking has been demonized in the span of only 40 years. The 44% of them who smoked would look at this like the second .ing of Prohibition, when alcohol was outlawed. It could never last! But they haven’t heard the steady drum beat of health concerns, which have been addressed in anti-smoking law much better than in air pollution, water pollution, and food safety. Why shouldn’t the law-abiding smoker feel discriminated against, when his car can pollute the air in the street but he can’t pollute the air in the patio five feet away? He used to smoke inside the stadium, but now he can’t even smoke in the parking lot. Yet careless waste management on a farm can pollute vast spinach fields and give hundreds of people E Coli? Ah well, forbidden pleasures will always have their trade-offs. Despite changes in the law, today’s smoker is much like yesteryears a social creature, a non-conformist, a risk taker. They might like to find each other, but their natural meeting place the smoky bar has gone on the endangered species list. Casual puffers and heavy smokers all face identical stigmas, yet none of this has beaten them down nor stifled their desire to find romance and love. Smokers are people, too, not lepers and social outcasts, and why shouldn’t they be able to use free dating sites on the web? Without lying, it seems impossible. That was before the advent of specialized dating sites. With a little searching, it should be possible to find a dating service that wel.es smokers instead of ostracizing them. Not too long ago, people with tattoos suffered social stigma, so attitudes do change. But that’s not likely to happen to smokers, no matter how much they cooperate and adapt. Until the rest of society realizes that damning smokers is unnecessary in the rush to legislate them, smokers can take some .fort from knowing there are many other like them out there. They just have to be more creative in finding them. About the Author: 相关的主题文章: